When you ask for wide-width nonwoven fabric, the quote usually comes back in one of two ways: full width, formed in a single pass with no seam; or spliced, where two or more webs are joined to reach the required width. The prices differ — spliced is noticeably cheaper. But the real question isn't the price gap. It's whether the seam performance can truly match that of a seamless full-width roll.
Dongguan Hendar Cloth Industry Co., Ltd. produces PP spunbond nonwoven fabric in base widths of 2.4 m and 3.2 m, and builds wider specifications — 4.8 m, 6.4 m and above — by splicing. Whether a spliced roll is the right choice depends on where the fabric is used and in which direction the load runs.
A full-width roll is formed in a single pass. Material properties stay continuous across the whole web, with no weak point introduced by joining. A spliced roll carries a longitudinal seam where the webs meet. At that seam, fibre continuity differs from the rest of the roll, and so does behaviour under tension.
|
Where the seam lies, the boundaries of application are drawn. The seam is not a defect; it has a boundary of application. When a spliced roll is used where a full-width roll was assumed, failure almost always appears along that seam. Conversely, paying full-width prices where the seam would never limit performance buys cost without a matching gain. |
The rule of thumb: a spliced roll is not a second-grade product, it is a different specification. It only fails when it is applied in the wrong place.
Width limits are material-specific, which is often overlooked. The same question — “how wide can you go?” — gets different answers depending on the web:
| Material | Width capability | How width is achieved |
|---|---|---|
| PP spunbond nonwoven | Base 2.4 m / 3.2 m, wider up to 4.8 m and 6.4 m | Single-pass base width plus splicing |
| Meltblown nonwoven | Max 1600 mm | Slit to required width |
| Laminated (coated) nonwoven | Within 1600 mm | Limited by lamination line width |
So simply asking for "wide width" makes no sense. The material has to be named first, because the achievable width and the available splicing solution both change with it.
Wide width also depends on the line itself. Hendar runs multiple fully enclosed high-speed lines covering PP spunbond, SMS, meltblown and lamination, so both full-width and spliced solutions are completed in-house without a third-party conversion step. That is why wide-width requirements are best raised early, during specification review.
Is spliced nonwoven fabric much cheaper than full width?
The gap depends on material, width solution and order volume; there is no universal ratio. Splicing saves material and processing cost; whether it pays off depends on whether the application can accept a seam.
Will the seam pull apart?
Bond strength at a seam is determined by the joining process and is normally lower than a monolithic web. Whether it is sufficient depends on load magnitude and direction; for load-bearing applications, spliced rolls should not be specified.
Does a seam matter for agricultural covering?
Covering applications carry mainly self-weight and light wind lift, so a seam generally does not affect service — which is why covering is a common use for spliced rolls. Long-term tensioned fixing still needs separate evaluation.
Hendar lists net width, roll and core specification, seam position, packaging and acceptance method together at specification confirmation, so an unproducible specification is never found after scheduling.
When you ask for wide-width nonwoven fabric, the quote usually comes back in one of two ways: full width, formed in a single pass with no seam; or spliced, where two or more webs are joined to reach the required width. The prices differ — spliced is noticeably cheaper. But the real question isn't the price gap. It's whether the seam performance can truly match that of a seamless full-width roll.
Dongguan Hendar Cloth Industry Co., Ltd. produces PP spunbond nonwoven fabric in base widths of 2.4 m and 3.2 m, and builds wider specifications — 4.8 m, 6.4 m and above — by splicing. Whether a spliced roll is the right choice depends on where the fabric is used and in which direction the load runs.
A full-width roll is formed in a single pass. Material properties stay continuous across the whole web, with no weak point introduced by joining. A spliced roll carries a longitudinal seam where the webs meet. At that seam, fibre continuity differs from the rest of the roll, and so does behaviour under tension.
|
Where the seam lies, the boundaries of application are drawn. The seam is not a defect; it has a boundary of application. When a spliced roll is used where a full-width roll was assumed, failure almost always appears along that seam. Conversely, paying full-width prices where the seam would never limit performance buys cost without a matching gain. |
The rule of thumb: a spliced roll is not a second-grade product, it is a different specification. It only fails when it is applied in the wrong place.
Width limits are material-specific, which is often overlooked. The same question — “how wide can you go?” — gets different answers depending on the web:
| Material | Width capability | How width is achieved |
|---|---|---|
| PP spunbond nonwoven | Base 2.4 m / 3.2 m, wider up to 4.8 m and 6.4 m | Single-pass base width plus splicing |
| Meltblown nonwoven | Max 1600 mm | Slit to required width |
| Laminated (coated) nonwoven | Within 1600 mm | Limited by lamination line width |
So simply asking for "wide width" makes no sense. The material has to be named first, because the achievable width and the available splicing solution both change with it.
Wide width also depends on the line itself. Hendar runs multiple fully enclosed high-speed lines covering PP spunbond, SMS, meltblown and lamination, so both full-width and spliced solutions are completed in-house without a third-party conversion step. That is why wide-width requirements are best raised early, during specification review.
Is spliced nonwoven fabric much cheaper than full width?
The gap depends on material, width solution and order volume; there is no universal ratio. Splicing saves material and processing cost; whether it pays off depends on whether the application can accept a seam.
Will the seam pull apart?
Bond strength at a seam is determined by the joining process and is normally lower than a monolithic web. Whether it is sufficient depends on load magnitude and direction; for load-bearing applications, spliced rolls should not be specified.
Does a seam matter for agricultural covering?
Covering applications carry mainly self-weight and light wind lift, so a seam generally does not affect service — which is why covering is a common use for spliced rolls. Long-term tensioned fixing still needs separate evaluation.
Hendar lists net width, roll and core specification, seam position, packaging and acceptance method together at specification confirmation, so an unproducible specification is never found after scheduling.
english
français
Deutsch
Italiano
Русский
Español
português
Nederlandse
ελληνικά
日本語
한국
العربية
हिन्दी
tiếng Việt